>>13509808>NOT SOME SUPREME COURT CASE THAT IS IRRELEVANT,alright, how about all of these, that were thrown out because fraud was committed and shown to be with enough standing to overthrow the decision that had previously been made and stood as law. You dont see things like this as much these days, but there has never been a case so blatant, that you couldnt help but see the fraud from every angle. Regardless of whether or not the senate voted, states sent in electors, Biden was "fakely" inaugurated, its all fraudulent and it needs to be undone. Thats like someone coming in with guns and running you out of your house, squatting, and staying there telling you that you cant come back. They are not the rightful owners, even though they have guns and prepare to shoot you for coming into your own house, its still your house, they are in there illegally, they got in by force and no matter what they do or how long they stay in your house, it is still not theirs... Are you getting this or are you too thick skulled and believe Biden legitimately won? No amount of gaslighting will ever make Biden a legitimate president, no amount of cover up will ever cover up what they did, its fraudulent from top to bottom.
Mason v Messinger (1864)
Rice v Bruff (1895)
Poter v Roundtree (1900)
Warthren v Himstreet (1900)
Hardeman v Donaghey (1911)
Weedman v Fowler (1911)
DeSoto v Hill (1914)
