>>20998233>I have addressed tons of pointsall you did was attacking one statement I made, regarding production of defense, which I specified 5 times to be not relevant for my argument.
you have not made one argument in favor of any other form of intervention in the economy, during our discussion besides a very vague "it is fair to intervene in the right (unspecified) circumstances". alternatively you were on the "muh monopolies" thing against which I've made my point clear and thus far you've been unable to refute it.
it's funny because you've always claimed to be particularly intelligent, yet this discussion has been for me not much different than arguing with a llm that can't even track dialogues.
either your brain has been switched off in this thread, or your self-assessment is too optimistic
