>>17237184.) It's all subjective and it's untestable (I think), but I'm just worried I'm missing out on all
the epic tastes my friends are. I mean, I'm circumcised and never fret over the more
sensitive sex my European friends are having. For some reason. Maybe it's 'cuz I'm a
"2 pump chump" and can't imagine being any more sensitive than I already am. :P
But in the debated studies where they measure foreskin sensitivity, they do it with heat
and pressure. These seem subjective and faulty as well. Is it not possible for a person
to be more sensitive and feel pleasure much stronger than they do heat? Is there a test
for how amazing an orgasm was?
5.) So it's been proven that deaf and blind people rewire their nervous system. If this is
true with a complete lack of a sense, and with stroke victims, then logically it's true
(to a lesser degree) for weaker senses as well, right?
6.) Maybe I'm just in denial and have some sort of Freudian nasal/foreskin envy. If that's
the case I'd rather take the red pill. What kind of an atheist would I be otherwise?
