>>19492870>can you show me an instance of a christian in the new testament using a sword to defend himself or others?Not going to play your talmud games. There is no example of a new testament Christian "refusing to gamble" but we know that is desirable behavior. Absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence, but you of course want to use that fallacy to "prove" your argument. Pathetic.
>i think your interpretation is clearly wrong given the behavior of christians depicted in the new testamentI don't care about your opinion. No pacifist would ever instruct his followers to buy military weapons and carry them.
>>19492871>memeflag probable jew mindlessly quotes out of context verseLaughable. Peter also previously said Jesus could never be killed and Jesus rebuked him. Jesus did not want the disciples to defend themselves in that exact scenario because his purpose was to be taken captive and literally save humanity, so when Peter struck the priest he told him to stop for that reason.
>>19492873>trust me bro it was figurative because I need it to be to fit my argument, no other reasonPathetic none argument
It was not figurative. He said sell your cloak and buy a sword if you DON'T have one. There is nothing figurative about that.
