>>13583411Do you understand it's about "entertainment on demand" why e-celebs are able to get so rich?
An universal-accepted useful occupation, a doctor can only look and help a single patient at a moment and can only charge for an acceptable sum of money based on the treatment, meanwhile a streamer can for example consecutively entertain ten thousand viewers. Each of those viewers has the option to decide if they want to give the streamer money, they can donate with an undefined amount, do a monthly subscription or even nothing, because no one is forcing them to pay for digital entertainment, but people still do, at least 1% of anyone's viewerbase will buy everyhing they shit out, they are the actual piggy banks everyone wants to have.
If you want to regulate them you have restrict the number of viewers for every streamer and how much they are allowed to spend, forcing them to become like real comedian who can only have that much free places for their show. But a regulation like that could make the current top-streamers more desirable and rich than ever before, because now they are just for a limited number of people available and piggy bank viewers would pay everytime to gain a spot. Anyone less popular than the top-streamers will never be able to become popular with this kind of regulation of content.
