>>21672737>All you will ever get is chad's sloppy secondsThis didn't used to be such an issue when men were also much more sexually active, then it was just "well, everyone has a past." That's not necessarily true anymore for men, everyone *doesn't* have a past. We're roughly 2 generations of men in now where the amount of sexually inactive men has reached levels that were unfathomable 20 years ago. What is it, like 2/3rds of gen Z men aren't fucking?
So yeah, under those circumstances, I could easily see why a lot of men would have issue with being called to be provider for women who they were invisible to up until a week ago. Y'all have your work cut out for you.
