>>20859680The classification of cereal with milk as a soup is an interesting and somewhat playful debate. While there is no definitive answer, as it largely depends on one's interpretation of what constitutes a "soup," here are some points to consider:
Arguments for Cereal with Milk Being a Soup:
Liquid Base: Soup typically consists of a liquid base, such as broth, stock, or even milk. In this case, the milk serves as the liquid base for the cereal.
Solid Ingredients in Liquid: Soups often contain solid ingredients suspended in liquid. Similarly, cereal consists of solid pieces (the cereal itself) submerged in milk.
Consumption Method: Both cereal with milk and soup are eaten with a spoon, often from a bowl, and are consumed in a similar manner.
Arguments Against Cereal with Milk Being a Soup:
Temperature: Soup is typically hot (though there are cold soups, like gazpacho). Cereal with milk is usually served cold, which is a significant departure from the common perception of soup.
Preparation: Soup often involves cooking or at least some preparation beyond simple assembly, such as blending ingredients, simmering, or seasoning. Cereal with milk is typically a quick, uncooked meal, involving just pouring milk over cereal.
Purpose and Tradition: Soup is traditionally considered a savory dish, often served as a starter or a meal in itself. Cereal with milk is usually a breakfast item and is generally sweet.
Conclusion:
While cereal with milk shares some characteristics with soup (a liquid base and solid components), it doesn't fully align with traditional definitions of soup, particularly in terms of preparation, temperature, and culinary tradition. However, the question is more of a fun, philosophical or linguistic one rather than a strict culinary classification. Ultimately, whether cereal with milk is considered a soup can vary based on personal or cultural interpretations.
