Ok. Here's the image. I wasted way too much effort doing this.
>>10350522thx for bumping, thread almost timed out, and my internet crashed.
>inb4 bogged>I can provide PHP code.sorry, but we won't be needing PHP (at least not for the network code, and most likely neither for the front-end code).
>It should be a filter one can OPTIONALLY applyThat's why I think filtering should happen on the client side, with opt-in ban lists that you can get from wherever you want (no central banning authority, you can even create your own lists and share them).
>Let's make a TEMPLATE system that everyone can implement and improve.That's kind of problematic, though, since the protocol and the architecture are tightly coupled. However, I think that the P2P network code should be possible to be made into a library that can be reused by other projects. And the (self-pruning) blockchain can be generalised, too, I guess.
>>10350524wew lad
