>>21503049Go wif ur heart
But early voting in CA indicates that mail ballot returns are higher among republicans than democrats, which could lead to them being shredded, but as voting becomes more republican the closer to election day it indicates democrats are underperforming in california. They won't lose but if republicans are pulling 6.6 million votes and democrats fall to 10.2 million votes, the Trump's popular vote advantage in Florida/Texas will make it very difficult for Kamala to win the overall popular vote.
Of course, for a republican in the swing states where he is already leading, this would probably lead to him sweeping the board and getting a range of 77-73 million or 84 million to 70 million in the popular vote, which translates to an electoral college sweep.
It is too early to say "definitely" but all factors are pointing to harris getting spitroasted unless 20 million democrats turn out on election day more than expected.
The reason why this is unlikely is because Democratic GOTV is geared towards mail ballot voting, not in person voting, precincts in blue areas are underfunded and understaffed as a result and cannot handle large scale election day turnout. So if democrats are underperforming 2020 (they are) it indicates they will have an uphill battle to unfuck themselves.
>>21503051Both candidates have a theoretical interest in maintaining US dominance in semis but only Trump will both disrupt the market by shitting on China and Taiwan while also strengthening US based companies, causing volatility pumps that are ideal for swing traders. If I was speaking with a bias I would also guess that Harris will be drunk most of the time if she is president and completely fucked our strategic advantage up, also
>calls>on an already leveraged etf 