>>7361444Now, that’s one part of female nature. To seek strong men, and to test their current men. Now for the second part; submissive agreeableness. To seek to fit in to society. I see guys on /pol/ complaining about women all the time. Why are they such sluts? Why do they have no values? You retards. They are behaving exactly as they are being programmed to by society.
The keyword, the key difference between us, is AGENCY. Men use their logic, their reason, to decide what is right. We can take the risk of standing against the current if we choose to, to ignore the herd and forge our own path. We are strong enough to stand alone, and if our risk pays off, we will be the alpha. Women do not do this. There is no biological incentive to do so. It is more important for them to fit in, as they are weak and need support.
You see, women are just like rivers. Vitally important for life, but they are a force of nature. They do NOT have agency like men do. Do you yell at a river when it floods and destroys your house? Do you hate water because you look at the polluted Ganges, and decide it is filthy and not worthy of you? Or do you blame yourself for not building the house in the right place? Do you go upstream to find less polluted waters?
Women are water. Men can use their minds and muscles to build great docks, canals, aqueducts and ships with which to build great civilisations. But if we stop actively controlling it, the water erodes the buildings. It seeps through the cracks and rots the ships. It breaks through the dams and destroys everything. Do we blame it for not being rational? For not understanding why we have to direct it? Of course not. Blaming women for not having principles is as retarded as blaming water itself for bursting flood defences. It is our job to direct them, because understanding direction is in our nature, not theirs.
