>>13221741>1)>All this I mention here used quite a bit of words, and it either explained something or it didn't at all and was total mumbo jumbo, see?You wanted to prove that words don't nessecarly carry anything.
>2)OP was about the seeming entitlement of those that disagree with one's point of view. Whole thing was on a thin line between bait and attention whoring. Dunno what was more prevalent.
>3)Yea well you can't say that about anything but it makes stuff boring. And to me you just like the
>This is like that, but it actually isn't, but what if it is? That means it actually is the other thing, but is it?It's really cute but easily gets boring,
