>>17584083i was just thinking about images that are like conceptually decent but executed poorly, so when you just replace the character to be ai made it doesn't look that bad because obviously ai generated characters look better than human generated poorly drawn characters
and actually i'm just curious too see how will this work out, and sometimes it's easier to just post an image as a reference than explaining a lot of stuff if you know what i mean
and not that i'm saying that this image i'm posting is bad, the artstyle is just very specific and yeah yet i'm just curious, i'm a scientist and stuff
