>>1770108>it's inherently impossible for you to "prove me wrong", because you're the one making claimsYou implicitly claimed that there's no need for a minimum wage. I exposed my arguments and you didn't refute them.
>proclaiming that your position is an axiom and that other people agree with itDo you want me to ask every person in the world if they agree? I think you can pretty much assume it is an axiom by simple observing how the world works. That's called empirical evidence and it's equally valid as long as the observation process is not biased.
