>>12636810> to prove the existence of God by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a supreme being and that God must therefore be the source of logic and morals.well I'll give you couple
> on logiccan you explain to me the existence of logic without circular argumentation? (I know "muh argumatentive mistakes" are retarded & something taht shoe size IQ niggers latch onto, but would like to hear a proof to this).
> on moralsIt's commonly known that atheists consider every individual moral to be equally valid when comparing morals against each other. This opens the following question: what is the determinant of good and evil?
Well for atheists it is feelings of course, since every moral is equally valid, but which one can consider PERSONALLY superior, are those that they feel good about.
This means an atheist individual has no moral hierarchy over another individual, since every personally superior moral is equally good.
And hence, atheists of /pol/ have absolutely no moral high ground nor authority to prevent their sons from whoring themselves to niggers in exchange of a bag of heroine. Or this same son from knocking the atheist's daughter up.
After all, the sons could consider both the hedonistic sexual submissivity and drug consumption good & the daughter loving his brother the greatest thing ever, on their own personal moral level.
