>>12438812The new narrative is:
German history took a barbaric turn around the 18th century. the empires before the third one paved its way and the third coming of germany was their conclusion. Germany as a concept must be reforged or abolished to become a force of good and create socialism/federalised europe/euromerica/whatever vision is seen as good.
The world would have been on track to become socialism/federalised europe/euomerica/whatever vision if not for the german regression. We carry an immense responsibility to constantly struggle against such regressions and kick the march of the countries progression forward in mind and deed.
Variations on guiltquestion:
The holocaust was the fault of a government minority, people were complicit out of fear and comfort but we cannot afford ourselfes to be afraid or comfortable today with such historic results.
Germandom is just an evil racist meme to justifie robbing and stealing. Everyone is very guilty.
We arent guilty today as we didnt do it ourselves but we can attain guilt by not distancing us from the generations before us by opposing the democratic processes that transform germany.
>such regressionsare pictured by the far right that holed up either in "holocaust was a lie/not that bad" denial or just so agressive they place themselves out of society. There were progroms in the east during the 90s, ordinary people teamed up to burn refugees alife. This was due to a lack of western education and an unstable communist explanation of the past. This negative example invirogates the new narrative to this day.
The dumb violent eastern Nazi and the smart western hidden nazi are very lifely scarecrows since decades.
Academic/nonpleb discourse is either about defending the historic uniqueness of the holocaust from moral relativists/historicists prominent on the right or about exploring the holocaust and debating how and why it happened in very very particular details to settle the uniquenessquestion
