>>9965476This is egregious, punishing him for having genuine concerns about the men under his command.
Such a technicality to get him as well, "didn't do enough to ensure it wasn't leaked", why not listen to him in the first place? Unless they want an understaffed nuclear-grade ship roaming outside the south china sea
It's all so tiresome
>>9965481Mhm, look away when sneezing
