>>11556854Thanks anon for your reply, I see, you're right I always end up mixing these, partly because they're confusing by themselves.
I fear might be falling to fallacies here, can you tell me more about the actual relation between biology and gender (if there's any)?
And speaking about societal roles, I'm willing to admit that most are or at least a considerable portion of what's considered to be Male or Female it's due to cultural factors but what about other species of mammals? Why do they have similar behaviors to the roles of Male or Female.
Ex: The female mammal (almost) always protective to their babies, even risking her life to protect them, she always assumes a motherly role. She's usually submissive to the male.
And the father (depends on the species) tend to be protective of his mate and (sometimes) of his babies, the male is usually the one who hunts and brings food, etc.
My point is, aren't some or at least the most important traits of being male or female defined by Genetics as well?
