>>20953332My assumption is that they were hired by a venue like a bar to bring in a bunch of customers.
Nonetheless, the point that
>>20952933 made:
> every dude always had this look of disgust on their faceis interesting. Men perceiving that a woman is willing to have sex with anyone (even though in this case that was an illusion) get disgusted by it. Men want a woman who wants to have sex with him ...not with everyone.
Not the difference between that story (women offering every passing man a condom and implying sex) vs. the well-known study where a woman would approach a man and offer him sex. In that study, each man thought (however naively) that he was getting a personal proposition.
Back to the OP story - a man can stomach the idea that his girl is selective, and selected him, and maybe selected other guys in the past. It's not what we truly want (we'd prefer a virgin) but it's okay. A huge part of the mistake OP made is revealing to her guy that she WASNT selective in the past. She had hookups, fwb, etc. The only "selection" was ...not with him.
So now he's realizing that she's not a thing of value that's worth protecting.
