>>20681814So what if they used sfw models? If anything that gives it more validity, because people were getting turned on even looking at non sexual stuff.
It says phallometric studies, which means they got an erection.
Besides there are shitload of studies out there that point towards the same facts, men want to fuck women even if they're under the government determined acceptable age.
Not that you even need any study for this subject. The age of consent at 16-18 is a fairly modern invention and doesn't correlate with reality at all.
Men just pretend not to be attracted to some hot firm bodied 14 year old, because they know the virtue signaling outrage that results from admitting something like that.
Do you think that on dating sites men's attraction towards women actually starts from 20, just because the chart says it's when they're the most wanted?
It's simply the lowest it can go, but if that range went down to 10 years old and there was no stigma about it, the numbers would be way lower than 20.
