>>11084912Not to be a bummer or anything, but the currently accepted system is all a bunch of unverifiable claims.
>Gravity is realOnly verifiable on a planetary bases, not verifiable, essentially.
>Some star formations defy what gravity teaches usIt's spinning retardedly fast which is why it has such a shape. Also, unverifiable
>Macro-Evolution is realbut only on a time scale unverifiable to any of us
See where I'm getting ? it's all just wishful thinking and unverifiable stuff.
Wanna look further into it ? Youtube : The primer fields by David LaPoint. Not a flat earther, by the way.