>>19055953>>19055956It's always in this style too, where they quote exactly one verse that says something that sorta sounds good but leaves out the rest of the story around that verse and the general context of the entire book, in this case one of the Gospels. This is most egregious is the "sell your cloak and buy a sword" line, which is used constantly here to try to prove Jesus was a based warrior but conveniently forgets what happens with the sword immediately after it's purchased.
It's appropriately quite rabbinical in nature, lies by omission that just rely on you not knowing the books very well and not looking any further into it. By citing book/chapter/verse that sounds like whatever point you want to make, you can "prove" anything you want with one limited text. And then all the other dumb Christians have to nod their heads.
