>>17966219Albert Einstein understood this, even though you don't, and he was a midwit Jew who stole most of his ideas from other people.
Einstein argued that the universe must have always existed, and never had a beginning, because the opposite, to suppose that it had a beginning, de-facto ceded everything to theism, and was practically an outright admission that God (or some sort of creator entity) is real. Thus, until the day he died, Einstein argued that the universe never had a beginning, and neither would it ever end, but that it was in fact a static equilibrium we simply were not yet capable of understanding.
Fast forward a hundred years, and atheists unironically all believe in the big bang but still insist that it's the theists who are delusional, when everything they believe in is built upon argumentation that was debunked before any of their grandfathers were ever born.
It's the same shit with Darwin. In his time, microscopes weren't advanced enough to see inside cells, so the ruling theory was that all cells were full of a kind of universal protoplasmic soup. In Origin of Species, Darwin himself admits that this presumption underpins his entire hypothesis of evolution, and that if it were ever shown that cells had complex microscopic mechanisms inside of them, that it de-facto debunked his theories. Fast forward to today, and atheists unironically all believe in Darwin's theories, in spite of knowing that cells are extremely complex machines.
Both the Big Bang and Evolution require university level cognitive dissonance to believe them. This proves that atheism is, and always has been, a cope pseudo-religion for midwits who simply despise Christianity for emotional reasons. Real scientists are all theists. Darwin would admit his own theories were mistaken if he were alive today, and Einstein would throw up his hands in exasperation at your goofy circular arguments regarding the Big Bang. You understand none of this. You fucking pseud.