>>15467987Only a fucking retard would think marriage is a good idea, in this day and age. It is surprising that men are still promoting marriage after so much of recent history demonstrates the entire vocation to be totally against them; men rarely benefit from it, if at all, nor do they stand a chance at being successful at it.
The men who defend the criminal contract of marriage, pose a direct threat to male freedom and sovereignty, because they frame marriage—a contract that can legally enslave any man—as some acceptable risk to be encouraged, as though some benefit can be garnered that could possibly balance out a man’s potential legal enslavement upon divorce. Isn’t it strange that the budgetary political wing of the most powerful country in the western world is named after a sex act? Congress. Why is it that the prefix “matri” (mother or maternity), along with the suffix “mony” (status), is combined to form the very definition of the word “marriage”? One can pretty up this exploitative, criminal contract of misandry all he wants, but language; always in the syntax the unconscious truth makes itself apparent. The word “matrimony”, indeed, translates to “mother status”. Notice, men, you are not even mentioned and that isn’t by accident, neither is it on purpose. It just so happens to be inherent to us as human beings that it is embedded within our language.
http://speculareffect.org/2022/06/13/mgtow-monday-men-still-want-marriage-why/http://speculareffect.org/2022/06/13/mgtow-monday-why-are-men-still-promoting-marriage/ 