>>20398586hi, I'm back from lunch.
So, in regards to the cameras, they were modified Hasselblad 500EL cameras. They had silver coated exteriors to reflect heat and maintain internal temperature, used special thin films with special emulsions by Kodak, such as Ektachrome and Panatomic-X, and they had anti-static measures to prevent static buildup in the vacuum of space.
As you can see, not much was normal about such cameras. Engineers knew the conditions they would face in space and they addressed them. Again, challenging engineering does not mean impossible engineering.
There is much information about this online, but nonetheless, you're going to say "NASA is fake", to which I say "go to the space museums in the US and verify yourself", to which you'll say "I can't test them myself", so I say "that's some deep paranoia shit if you get to that point", but try and file a special request for you to have access to such cameras and do your own testing on those historical artifacts, and that's where our debate ends, with your paranoia verifying every little detail in complete disbelief about everyone lese out there, and there's nothing else I can say to you to help you there, except perhaps, and with no offense: therapy.
pic unrelated. Lunar Module Pilot Edwin E. Aldrin (front) and Spacecraft Commander Neil Armstrong (rear) practice lunar surface activities on mock setup.
