>>8535480>I can argue with that, there are cunts with gpd less that 100 mils, walmart's mcap is over 300 bln.Wealth of an individual or business is not a qualifier of a country. A country is a landmass with a government. A country is a country when it is accepted as such by the other countries. Arbitrary yes, but so is our whole financial system. People can make businesses within a country. Those businesses are not themselves, a country. I don't even feel like I aught to need to argue this. To make myself clear though, I was only referring to conventional countries when I was talking about needing examples. Your twisting of definitions is ultimately irrelevant.
>This is the premise of a statement "taxation is theft". All of that already happening right now and only problem with it is you can't really choose service provider and are stuck with what you got.You can move country, though.
>Thats why large corps are structured in a way where they own multiple businesses which compete with each other to avoid stagnation.I doubt that would happen in my example though. The country would likely unify under one large corp that would eventually be the government. Either that or itd unify under multiple, which would become either independent countries, or states of one country. Either way the result is the same, unavoidable and morally questionable taxation. Ultimately though this too is all hypothetical. Just a thought experiment regardless of how you think it'd turn out. Nobody really knows.
