>>13319940I should add, that after all these transfers, it seems the actual plane that was "flight 93" was flight 11, in terms of the actual plane that was shot down. The planes for flight 175 and flight 93 were reported in service after that day, and they seem to have landed (empty) in Cincinnati. Truthers already know this, from ACARS data reported on Pilots for 9/11 Truth, it's reported in Loose Change, I just added the empty bit. The planes couldn't have passengers, because then it requires conspiracy to get rid of them.
Each of these drills can be easily justified as simulating some aspect of multiple simultaneous hijacking, that's what people were simulating on 9/11 (among other things). All you need to do is pull that little switcheroo on the day of the attack, and make the drone blips continue to the WTC and Pentagon. The shooting of flight 93 is justified by the other attacks. It is a rather ingenious plan, and the killer thing about it is that not even the president, or the advisors, nobody knows what happened! They are just weirded out that on the day you were organizing drills, a major attack also happened.
You plant intelligence suggesting this type of attack is brewing, it's really possible for one person. Then when the CIA is under pressure to say who did it, they find your bullshit, and they will say it was Bin Laden, from the made up reports you sent down with "Top Secret" all over them. From this point on, a cover-up organically emerges, because nobody knows what actually happened. You don't need any help, no illuminati, nothing. Plus, you were busily preparing for such an attack on the very day of the attack! Boy, are you a genius. You get a lot of power in the administration, people think you are some sort of little god.
There is no innocent explanation for the drills of that day, and the drills required to stage the attack match the drills that are known to have occurred with precision, so I gained enough confidence to be certain.
