>>19593302>It literally looks like schizo rambling.To stupid people I'm sure it does.
>But go ahead, explain the argumentPottery.
I explain why I'm not going to explain it, and you instantly prove your fundamental lack of ability to read and tell me to explain it... which reinforces the very reason I didn't explain it.
>What assumptions? Dark matter. Without that, CMBR isn't real.
>They only disagree in the rate of change, not the direction of change.Doesn't matter. The "science" is fundamentally flawed, tainted, useless. That data might as well be thrown out.
>I'm not trying to falsify evolutionThe topic was falsification, you said "nuh uh" it ackshully is falsifiable, then gave your garbage list of 6 things I debunked.
If you are too stupid to keep track of that, great, I don't care, but evolution remains unfalsifiable.
>There's no reason to choose aliens as an option over a natural theory which requires infinitely less assumptions. Occam's Razor.It was a hypothetical to prove evolution is unfalsifiable
You are one of the dumbest peple pretending to be smart I have seen in a loooong time.
>Present your argument why aliens is a more reasonable solution than natural evolutionary processes that we observe today.It's like I'm talking to a confused child...
