>>22572584 >most women don't care about hair in this economy if you can provide for them They do care, they just do not have any choice when the economic situation is dire. This is why historically women were willing to put up with men in the first place. It was never about "love", women do not love idealistically like men do, they are almost purely utilitarian. At the same time they are masters of disguising themselves as hopeless, innocent romantics, while accusing men of their true nature ("men only want sex", "men are manipulative" etc). This is why the birthrate in every developing country plummets catastrophically, with no way to fix this. It just shows that as soon as women are no longer dependant on men to survive they just tell men to fuck off and live their own life. Men need women much more than vice versa, not because of economic reasons but for their own psychological wellbeing and social functionality, it's a cruel dynamic. Hell, 25% of all women are believed to be bisexual, with only 1-2% of all men, so a good chunk of them can just live together with other women happily.
