>>11244323You're right that most people don't want to live among race-rioters, but they're a product of leftist organizing and activists indoctrinated by the universities. The problem is academia and a lack of policing, if you can reform your institutions and crack skulls when it's necessary (which should be possible in a society that wants to survive) then this wouldn't happen.
The US had class warfare in the form of violent worker's strikes and Nazi Germany did not last long enough for us to draw conclusions from it. I will say however that Germany in previously had its own attempted leftist revolution, and even during the Protestant Reformation some of the instability was class based.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnster_rebellionLeftist does not make white nationalists directly, it causes it as a side effect. The initial racialization from leftist texts occurs in non-whites who use it as a justification for hostility and anti-whites who have negative in-group preferences. This begins to justify a white in-group reaction in self-defense.
The amount of violence at the border depends on the context. Separating a state such as America would result in a context that would promote violence due to territorial disputes, "oppressor vs oppressed" narratives, and heightened economic differences.
Also, if pushing identity creation to its furthest reaches from family to clan to tribe to nation, why would it not expand further? Doesn't a nation composed of tribes still have their differences, what about clans within a tribe?
The border and the home changes with time, this logic brings us to atomized individualism: if we were to prefer violence at the border and not at home, and the home contains borders within it due to the differences of internal groups, then wouldn't we seek to reduce the borders to that of the individual? It would lead us to having the violence of borders without the benefit of the home. It seems counterproductive.
