>>10381278men don’t think status is hot anon...
its literally the opposite.
the women who get awards or jobs on the screen are the last women men would pick, unless they are sociopathic money hunters.
ratings are very easy for men
>10/10, has titty and ass, cute face, younger than 30 old enough to not be underage, prime mom material in all ways>9/10 basically the same thing>8/10 same thing again leaving the realm of “hot” simply... “cute”>7/10 flaws/shortcomings becoming visible, >6/10 nearing plainness>5/10 plain by definition>4/10 the last plain folks to be called cute>3/10 no attraction but not repulsive>2/10 uncanny valley>1/10 something is wrong, lack of health, clearly leperotic. women on television tend to jump between 2.5 and 6.5 for me personally, they seem too fakey
anime girls are normally 7+ because they are written by based jap porn masters who know their craft.
and women I meet every day, average 4-8 generally, I don’t register sub 3 as any different than men generally.
when I was younger it was 6-10 idk what happened, I blame sex trafficking and porn industry eating 9-10’s alive before they are of age.
You overestimate what men think about when they have standards for women, men just want “the most fertile potential mom that won’t leave”
some men are smart and add their own additional criteria.
surprisingly this is similar to how women think of their own criteria...
“least pathetic man who won’t leave” it’s so tiresome.
