>>224661761t 1s what 1t 1s, 1 usually am car3ful w1th assum1ng who's who unl3ss th3y post und3n1abl3 proof. Too 3asy to anon sh1tpost and som3 p3opl3 r3ally g3t unh1ng3d wh3n th3y hat3 som3on3 for what3v3r r3asons and th3n pr3t3nd to b3 sa1d p3rson.
>>22466271Shrug.