>>16466145>>16466151This is some advance levels of cope and cherry-picking statistic that I have never seen in my life.
So we:
>live in more fertile and wet areas than the average Chilean>live in less deserted biomes than the average ChileanThis does not count tho because "muh in the total area it rains more here, even tho literally no one lives there".
BUT WAIT! Because:
>now per capita and averages do count when you need to represent arable land that way to cope >even tho our fertile areas DWARF Chile's by orders of magnitude in total area...it does not count cuz "muh per capita". No one in the word measures fertile land, dividing it by the number of inhabitants of the country. This is mad coping mechanisms.
Pic related...
