>>16169623I know the rule better than you do. You are committing the fallacy fallacy.
You force the conversation into College level Logic 101 and pluck out the nearest fallacy that sort of matches, and then declare the conclusion false because it matches.
Your error is that you're using logic to reason about a life form that creates universes to create itself.
Your fallacy list doesn't get to contribute to the probability of the outcome. And in the event you can get it to stick just a little bit. I can countermand it by saying fallacy-fallacy. Just because you've filled your brain with a fallacy detection device does not mean the conclusion is wrong. It means the conclusion is still whatever it was before you started contributing non-useful information.