>>21722369I consider religions and ideologies as moral frameworks. I am not sure if you have read many fictions, light novels or mangas? But I have read quite a lot in my youth possibly thousands. I have come to the conclusion that no matter how complicated the premise, the beginning or the storyline seemed. The story could always be summarised in a very simple manner and that the entire story is just fluff used to flesh out this summary.
Now in my opinion moral frameworks are the same. The core belief/foundation myth/summary for many of the religions and ideologies can be identified.
For Christianity I think that the core/foundation myth is based on equality(the soul) with everyone being under one god. Secondly it’s a death cult with a promise of paradise after death. But for everyone to be the same. You, your clan, tribe, ethnic group and race would lose your identity. Identity is the core for any collective. A collective will compete and fight for its own benefit. Just like the cells in your body each have your DNA and follow a hierarchy with their own roles. So do humans in ethnic groups with social classes under a collective identity.
Communism, freemasonry and atheism(materialist feminism)+the white guilt sect all push this idea of equality. Even the white identity pushes this idea of equality. Therefore it is an attack on blood based collectivisation.
When you consider who created and pushed these moral frameworks. You might start seeing a coincidence. If your entire ethnic group functions as a type of social parasite you wouldn’t want anyone to identify you. You wouldn’t want a collective to form to oppose you. You wouldn’t want a social hierarchy being visible since it would out you as the puppet master.
As such the opposition to such a moral framework would have be based on an opposite core/foundation myth/summary:
Inequality and life. We are different, we have our own roles, we have an identity.
