>>12871256>Everyone here does the same, but better.Nobody does it well. You've often talked to me about how I shouldn't get too emotionally invested in online discussions, but you seem to be pretty strongly interested (to an unhealthy degree) in participating in your two circles' threads on /r9k/ and /bant/, and I remember that the Swiss poster also said about 2 months ago that she didn't care for people on the Internet's opinion, but she also ended up leaving because she didn't like the idea of being treated like an orbiter, and well, obviously, there's other examples like the transphobic Italian who reposts shit from /lgbt/ on both /qa/ and /bant/ every day and dedicates all of his spare time fighting against some imaginary enemy (the /lgbt/-/pol/ boogeyman) that people take turns in playing the role of.
It's not just here on /bant/. You can also see it on /his/ and /pol/ whenever you come across those fedora-tipping recent converts to Christianity talking about how they think they're smarter than the average atheist, even though they use many of the same tactics and meme templates that New Atheists used to use back in the 2000s/early 2010s.
It's true that not everybody asserts their superiority through IQ, but it is very common for people to act as if they're somehow smarter than others because of the way they think, what they center their discussions around, or the kind of authorities they look up to.
I know this probably doesn't mean much to you, since you just wanted an excuse to let off some steam on Bigu, and I'm not saying that the kind of stuff he does is right, but you gotta at least accept that there's loads of other people who assert superiority through lip service to certain informal rules of popular discourse, and preach stuff that's very different from what they do.
