>>12758923Dualism's are contradictory. What more do you want to know?
>>12758927I never said anything of the sort
>>12758887>Okay I've given you several opportunities to provide any amount of material that lends credence to your outlandish claims. >when you confuse a question for a claimIs that like when you confuse a description for an explanation?
>Are you gonna tell me that you don't have a single piece of supporting evidence or supplementary literature to go with what you're saying?We don't know how magnets work. Care to explain how or are you going to keep putting words in my mouth?
>Literally anything would do, and you can't come up with anything?"dualism" is bullshit. What more do you need to know?
>>12758939Explain the difference, quantum quack.
