>>14404059>Pozzed HollywoodTheir choice.
Historically, Hollywood was known the, "fuck it" attitude.
They were trend setters, *not* trend followers.
And that's the problem with the commie mentality that's infected "The West" and also Hollywood too: the artists and creators over there are trend followers, not creators.
Don't fool yourself, China is limitations on their creativity hence why their best movie is a blatant propaganda motion picture. How original! Have not watched the motion picture because personally don't care for the propaganda of adversaries, nevertheless it appears this motion picture is akin to what The Thin Red Line and Saving Private Ryan were back in the '90s.
The '90s and early 2000s was arguably the end of Hollywood's limitless creativity; now, because of the socialist/communist mindset, they have set limit of what they create.
In summary:
"Pozzed" Hollywood is their own fault.
Once can argue that historically, Hollywood attracted artists and creators because it was a place to *set trends*; not follow them.
Exhibit A:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6tNCemS3PwAnd that "Apocalypse Now" was not from the '90s but decades previous!
The greatness of "Apocalypse Now" is that some folks perceive it as a war propaganda movie such as the famous, "I love the smell of Napalm in the morning" scene; yet if recalling correctly the underlying message was an anti-war message.
Anyways, the point is: the creative artistry that went into this motion picture, and others like it, were limitless, trend-setting, and were arguably created by folks who were not intimidated by what has become in the colloquial, the "cancel culture".
One could argue, perhaps back then, motion pictures were deliberately created *to* offend, as a means to test people, broaden their horizons, or simply become "conversation starters". These days, however, it seems artists create to *appease* their audience; to *follow* trends; and they don't *challenge* their audience.
