>>8573764>Sphynx etc.... yeah go on, if you know tell me what i should be looking out for.Individuals understood the sky when it was meaningful to them to live, because the industrial revolution allowed for surplus food we could specialize in fields leading to 10000 radio telescopes scanning the sky for shit we cant detect visually
>>8573768Nasa needs funding and the cgi is cooler for dumbasses to absorb then the actual images and data gathered.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/prelim_water_results.html>>8573763that looked like all three of them push around to get their feet into foot rails, not 100% since i dont know the layout of the ISS, and still looks like a guy touching his watch
>grasping and looking at the airthe guy in stripes? he holds the back wakk about moving to a different contact point and changes his mind, the chick did nothing interesting, she moved an arm
>"someone lying/decieving. Even hadfield has to look away"Hadfield's not just holding on, looks like hes trying to manipulate some knob/wheel
>Wrong-Yeah that was your best evidence, its still a video artifact, i would want to analyse myself and see the gear/proccessing.
>Your opinion/indoctrination wouldn't change either way. It's a religion.I spent the time reading and watching, im as open to your shit as could be
>>8573797video 1 lenses flares. look how overblown the image is.
video 2 im unsure but looks like those shitty tv camera, before and after there are strips of missing video from the top and bottom from the sent signal
the rest look fine, astronauts fall over, the geologist Harrison Schmitt was fucking shit at walking on the moon, the only non air force to do it.