>>13902742ohhh shit the gem thing, yea thats basically just "based" or "cringe"
>you'd be contributing to the advancement of humanity in a meaningful way.i was referring more to the fact that what you calculate can have a noticeable impact on how your experiment will go, but yea i get what you mean too. apologies for not clarifying
>You didn't find it creepy?well i did think it was a little weird at first, but i thought about it for a bit and it was more sweet than it was weird.
>What do you dislike about it?exactly what you mentioned, our technological advancements. or rather, our inability to properly adapt to it. quality of life could be much greater if legislature was a well oiled machine that could keep up with these newfound abilities and properly utilize them.
if i went any further, i'd be venturing off into a very political zone.
>our knowledge is limitedhm yea, without a doubt. you'll never know everything about a subject anyway.
>You'd only have wasted your life fighting for something that barely lasted.that's another thing yea. outside of the money you could get from lobbyists, why bother with it?
>I haven't read that much of either.what would your favorite genre be, if you dont mind me asking?
>Have you read Childhood's End?Oh man, that's one of Arthur C. Clarke's best works isn't it? I'm afraid I haven't, though it has been on my list for a little while now. I only ever hear good things about it.
