>>3451755>There are many explicitly non-materialist models of the world I can come up with that don't include a supreme being or beings.And that doesn't mean they're not religions. Consider Bhuddism and its cosmology. It is idealist, non-theistic and religious at the same time.
At this point it doesn't make sense to discuss anything any further, since it's all just a semantic quarrel over what do terms mean. No interest on seeing you pretend materialism isn't the main base behind modern day atheism and further nitpicking.
>>3454345I already knew the difference between materialism and idealism, I just lacked the correct term for the latter which is why I had to check it up in a moment.
