>>13417481It would, but that's very far away. Having a battery also takes up space and adds weight, which consumes more energy to move around. So like hinted earlier, you'd kinda have to go nuclear with it. Unless something very dramatic happens in the field of battery tech. Or maybe lightweight materials may mitigate the issues, since there are already battery operated robots? It doesn't need to be strong, like the Boston Dynamic Atlas, even for defensive purposes if you slap a gun on it. I personally haven't looked that much into the mobility aspect, since to me, it would be a domestic tool/assistant, mainly for the mind/memory, entertainment, companionship.