>>12731759That's good at least. On the other hand she would think you're a certified chubby chaser for that
>Maybe, but why would you do that?You've never heard of people watching? I think it's nice to think of what they might be out for or what their lives are like. I do like the scenery too when there's no one to look at, but that also contains a human element - thinking about the uses of buildings or who's living in them and what brought them there
>He really doesn't understand the value of money, does he?What, are you saying I'm not worth it? Kind of rude.... Apparently he has some investments and inheritance, so it's not like I'm bleeding him dry or anything. I have some conscience. I would stop before it gets to that point
>Which implies that a real maid would be even more stimulating than a robotShouldn't we want to eliminate the need for jobs like that? It's for the same reason they're automating all other unskilled jobs - eventually there should be no need for them. It is a relatively good thing. Eventually all people will be like that, for better or worse
>Perhaps it was made for children?I don't think so. Western or otherwise, many cartoons meant for adults suffer from the same problems. They're unnecessarily vulgar simply for the sake of it when they should be focusing on telling a story. Maybe they think that's what adults want or maybe it's just that the modern adult is more like a child. I should mention this is specific mainly to comedies. The other show doesn't rely on that stuff, but it's not meant to be a comedy either
No, it would be more like if you only posted video game characters
>You, on the other hand, never seem to focus on what would make you feel happyWhich is...? I don't know. Maybe you mentioned it before, but I'm not sure what you mean
It's not really copying. They had an ID branch before Hololive did, for example. I like the middle one's design the most and I'm not even sure what she's supposed to be. The mermaid is alright too