Quoted By:
>/pol/ will not allow me to upload probably because of traffic so I'm posting this here.
>
>This is what I've taken from the Russo-Ukranian conflict from a National Socialist perspective.
>
>Russian government is a corrupt oligarchy and successor state to the Soviet Union, Ukrainian government is a globalist unitary republic. Both of their current leaders have significant Jewish ancestry. Needless to say, both governments are fucking terrible and the people of Ukraine are in an unfortunate situation either way. Within Ukraine there is a large density of Aryans, and a good amount of National Socialist and even just nationalist groups. With a Russian takeover of Ukraine (especially since Putin has made one of his goals in Ukraine "denazification") these groups will no doubt be eradicated and silenced completely. With a Russian takeover of Ukraine there's no doubt that eastern Ukraine will be re-populated with mongoloid "Russians" and churkas on grounds of it being "ancestral Russian land". A huge reason for Eastern European nations like Finland and Ukraine who were previously neutral to join NATO is because of perpetual Russian aggression towards it's neighbors, and bad experiences with Russia in the past (Russia chimping out is making people side with American world government). Russia's government has never had the Aryan race in it's best interests, and it's not going to start now.
>
>Also, liberal westerners glorify Ukraine because Ukraine is weak and Russia is strong, liberals have a fetish for weakness and inferiority and support whoever is weak and inferior. Don't let retarded liberal social dogmas influence your worldview.
>
>TLDR: white people good, Ukraine have white people, Russia have not so many white people, both government bad, Russia never been good to white people, liberals retarded and use situation for their agenda
>
>Opinions?
