>>21787009He wrote about Jesus so what do you mean with "historical Jesus" in contrast him writing about Jesus Christ in his letters? Even if what you are saying is true, how is that a valid argument for anything? Do you idiot seriously claim that is a logical argument giving us evidence that Jesus Christ did not exist? Are you high? Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Worse, we have so much historical documentation.
To say that Jesus didn't exist is to be historically illiterate, there is less evidence for Alexander the Great, and many other historical figures and certainly almost all the pagan figures. Are those (like you) "questioning" the existence of Jesus also running around disputing the existence of all of them whenever those historical figures are mentioned? Do you expose "Buddha" to the Buddhists and new age people, and they're promoted in every shop now throughout the once great west. No.
It's more anti-Christian masonic enlightenment poison injected into our societies, promoted by Jews, Freemasons, and you embrace it and promote the lies and their anti-Christian double standards further for them.
