>>9642471>but it's not because fucking someones ass will not result in reproduction.Fucking someone with a condom will not result in reproduction either, and more importantly, it's not supposed to. I don't believe you should judge somebody being degenerate or not based on the degenerancy of their actions, but rather the degenerancy of their intent.
>That may only be true if you're dumb enough to think that you can get someone pregnant by fucking their ass. So no, it's just perversion.No. The fact you want to empty your balls holds true because you have some kind of reproductive behavior ingrained into your psyche.
>Fucking something that's meant to be fucked is different than something that's not meant to be fuckedThat's a bullshit subjective assessment. Obviously faggots are a natural phenomena, they exist all throughout the animal kingdom, and since they exist we must conclude that, to some extent, getting fucked in the ass is a natural phenomenon, as it is a logical conclusion from faggots being natural as well. If you wish to deny this, you must also claim that animals getting eaten by bigger animals is also an unnatural phenomenon, since the animal who's getting eaten (or the subject) isn't created with the intent of getting eaten, just as how the anus (the subject) isn't created with the intent of getting rammed (which, again, is an unmistakeably natural phenomemon)
>If it's not meant to be fucked = unnaturalLmao no. If it's a creation of human society and has little basis in human biology = unnatural. Getting fucked in the ass is not socially constructed, even some dogs are gay and have gay sex for fuck's sakes.
>Let's see those mental gymnastics.I'd love to show you, but i'm afraid i don't have a mirror to reflect your ugly mug in
>Also tell me how by your own logic, fucking animals is not okay?Easy. Animals cannot consent in the same way an adult human can consent. The motto goes: sex between consenting adults.
