>>12669905yes but your technical knowledge falls short of your practical knowledge. in this case i was using they explicitly to imply that when i say "someone" i truly don't know who it could be, as if the girl was representative of some larger whole and couldn't possibly be coping that hard on an individual level.
it's only been put in as formally acceptable recently, but trying to dismiss it as a colloquialism is absolutely pedantic. i've known people to use singular they since i was a child. i'm positive because i remember as early as elementary school being pissed because my teachers would try to correct me when i used it, but then i'd see it online or on tv all the time. at that point you're going down the same route as saying "y'all" isn't a real word or that ebonics is just wrong rather than being an accent or affectation
>>12669906right is my specialty
82 which puts my final grade at a 75 which is well within acceptable range. could've squeaked out a B if i did better on the final but it's whatever
yikes yeji
>>12669911well it wouldn't be funny and also it's pointless to speculate because it won't happen
definitely nonsense
