Quoted By:
Pathos is in important part of argumentation. This is something universally agreed upon.
The public's feelings on policy are important as well. Humans rather feel secure while insecure than be secure and feel insecure for the most part.
(This is correct assuming the general populous resides in intellectual serfdom, which seems to be the case in most nations nowadays).
So while discussing policy changes in regards to public life and the social contract, why is it that folks like Ben Shapiro or Stefan Molyneux feel the need to consider "feelings" as an illegitimate point in argumentation and debate? Also, Megumin is a loli.
