>>10094986>refuses to engage>continues to use fallacies >presented with the argument again.>refuses to engage. >continues to insult.How does optics cucking redpill anyone? If you dance around the subject won't people just take you at your word? Doesn't this also leave the people you are "redpilling" susceptible to false information in line with the optics?
Jordan Peterson comes to mind when talking about optics. Many said he was, is, a net gain for dissident right thought. Yet he actively herded whites away from nationalism (optics mind you) and dismissed the JQ entirely (optics again). Then he imploded on drugs.
