>>1786415>the meaning of the question depends on the intent of the author, therefore it has to do more with philosophy than mathematics1. This is a non-sequitur.
2. Applying your "logic" to other questions leads to obvious absurdities, e.g. "what's two plus two?" can also be interpreted in at least two ways, but nobody is going to seriously argue that it has more to do with philosophy than mathematics.
>there is no logical answer to the question, therefore it has to do more with philosophy than mathematics1. This is a non-sequitur
2. Applying your "logic" to other questions leads to obvious absurdities:
There is no logical answer to Russel's paradox either, and yet everyone agrees that it's a question about naive set theory.
You have demonstrated yourself, once again, to be an inferior brianlet. Proceed to sterilize yourself.
