>>16625719i think it depends on how you use it. like how much you engage here
If you use catalog to browse and view many low quality threads then yeah i think that can fuck you up. just staying in 1 or 2 threads shouldn't be too bad I think
>>16625728many such rare cases like that..doesnt make it less harmful
>>16625727>And posting doesn't?not if you are badass like I am
>Was the process itself any fun? Considering it was something new.it was mildly satisfying but I wouldn't call it fun. was just reading the recipe and following instructions basically.
>Can't any better than you. Maybe you should ask them to be honest, if you're too dubious about it?I did question it a little bit on the table but they said iit tasted fine so i just left it at that
